Arkansas has a large number of rural residents and economic empowerment has the potential to reduce the number of poor people living in the state.
The economic empowerment project that will be held in Wichita on June 19 has been one of the most anticipated and anticipated of the economic initiatives being held across the state this week.
In fact, many rural residents have expressed disappointment that the state government has not provided enough resources to help rural residents in the past.
The initiative is intended to help address issues that affect people’s lives, such as housing, transportation, employment, food security and education.
But some rural residents, such a former U.S. senator from Arkansas, say that the economic empowerment effort will hurt the state and its residents.
In the last several months, Gov.
Asa Hutchinson and other state leaders have made many attempts to attract more people to the state by offering tax breaks, incentives and other financial assistance.
The incentives include an $18 million incentive to expand the state’s gas and electric grid and a $3 million tax break for home owners.
However, those incentives have been seen as inadequate, and some rural areas have begun to protest.
On Tuesday, Hutchinson said he is “very confident” that the economy will grow and job creation will be strong in the next two to three years.
But rural areas in Arkansas have been complaining about the economic development efforts for months.
And while Hutchinson has acknowledged the economic efforts in the hopes that they will help alleviate some of the challenges they face, he has not promised to provide more resources.
The governor has been adamant that the incentives are too limited and has promised to meet with rural leaders in his state to discuss economic development strategies.
And Hutchinson has promised that the governor will continue to work with other states to address rural issues.
However and wherever he takes his stand, it is clear that the response from the governor and other political leaders has not been good.
Many rural people are concerned that the money that was promised to them is being used to help only those who can afford it.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, Arkansas is one of seven states that do not allow residents to participate in the incentive program.
The state has one of Arkansas’ highest poverty rates and the unemployment rate in Arkansas is the highest in the country.
And the economy is suffering from a shortage of jobs and people are struggling to make ends meet.
“The lack of resources is going to be a very real problem, not just in Arkansas, but in the rest of the country as well,” said Roberta Purdy, director of the Arkansas Rural Economic Development Center, who is a former governor.
“We need to make sure that we have resources to provide our people with economic security, to provide education and to provide other services that they need.”
One of the key challenges facing rural communities is that they are often the only ones left in the area, Purdy said.
She believes that the incentive programs should be extended to all areas of the state, but not in the same way that they have been used in other states.
For instance, the incentive that would help the largest percentage of residents, people making between $75,000 and $250,000, is only available in three counties in Arkansas.
The program is only offered to residents of the cities of Memphis, Little Rock and Littleton, and those making more than $250 for an individual or family.
The incentive is also available in all other counties, but only to people making less than $25,000 a year, Pundy said.
The number of people in Arkansas living below the poverty line has been rising since the mid-2000s.
And according to a 2014 report by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, nearly 20 percent of the population lives in poverty.
In 2012, Arkansas had the second highest poverty rate among states with a population of more than 20,000 people.
According the report, Arkansas’ poverty rate was highest in Shelby County, where there were over 30,000 residents living in poverty in 2013.
The unemployment rate for Arkansas’ rural population in 2013 was 11.9 percent, higher than the national rate of 9.2 percent.
Rural residents are also often one of those people who are affected by the lack of financial aid.
Purdy says that in recent years, many of the incentives that are being offered have been geared toward people who can get more financial aid than they could get in the early 1990s, when the state was struggling with its most recent economic downturn.
In addition to providing incentives for individuals to work, some states are also encouraging people to take part in community development projects.
But those projects are often geared toward a limited group of people and do not help many people.
Purdys work with the Arkansas Community Development Council, which is a nonprofit organization that works to help people who need help and can get it.
Puddys group has partnered with the U.K.-